Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama | Statement: [Scottsboro, associatedWith, U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama]

Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
Context triple: [Scottsboro, associatedWith, U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama]

• A. Powell v. Alabama
  Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
• B. NAACP v. Alabama
  NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
• C. Stone v. Mississippi
  Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
• D. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
  Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
• E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
  The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
Triple: [Scottsboro, associatedWith, U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama]

Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
Target entity description: Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.

• A. Powell v. Alabama
  Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
• B. NAACP v. Alabama
  NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
• C. Stone v. Mississippi
  Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
• D. Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham
  Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a city ordinance that gave officials broad discretion to deny parade permits, reinforcing First Amendment protections for civil rights demonstrators.
• E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
  The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
• F. None of above. chosen