Triple

T19777615
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Norris v. Alabama E475044 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935) | Statement: [Norris v. Alabama, fullName, Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935)
Context triple: [Norris v. Alabama, fullName, Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935)]
  • A. U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama chosen
    Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Powell v. Alabama
    Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
  • C. Swain v. Alabama
    Swain v. Alabama was a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set a high evidentiary bar for proving racial discrimination in jury selection, later overturned by Batson v. Kentucky.
  • D. Marsh v. Alabama
    Marsh v. Alabama is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case holding that a privately owned company town could not prohibit the distribution of religious literature on its sidewalks because they functioned like public streets under the First Amendment.
  • E. Hamilton v. Alabama
    Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51a43a08190956bc6df13c91a77 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65361a8e08190b52944aab25e45fa completed April 20, 2026, 4:25 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.