R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
E187679
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark 2017 UK Supreme Court case that held the government must obtain parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50 to leave the European Union.
All labels observed (5)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1659809 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Context triple: [European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017, precededBy, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]
-
A.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
B.
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is a key UK law that provided the legal framework for leaving the EU by repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and converting existing EU law into domestic legislation.
-
C.
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017
The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 is a UK law that authorized the Prime Minister to formally trigger Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, beginning the legal process of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU.
-
D.
Brexit
Brexit is the process by which the United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union, reshaping its political and economic relationship with Europe.
-
E.
Withdrawal Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union
The Withdrawal Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union is the legally binding treaty that set out the terms of the UK's orderly departure from the EU, covering issues such as citizens' rights, the financial settlement, and transition arrangements.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Target entity description: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark 2017 UK Supreme Court case that held the government must obtain parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50 to leave the European Union.
-
A.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
B.
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is a key UK law that provided the legal framework for leaving the EU by repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and converting existing EU law into domestic legislation.
-
C.
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017
The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 is a UK law that authorized the Prime Minister to formally trigger Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, beginning the legal process of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU.
-
D.
Brexit
Brexit is the process by which the United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union, reshaping its political and economic relationship with Europe.
-
E.
Withdrawal Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union
The Withdrawal Agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union is the legally binding treaty that set out the terms of the UK's orderly departure from the EU, covering issues such as citizens' rights, the financial settlement, and transition arrangements.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Brexit-related litigation
ⓘ
United Kingdom Supreme Court case ⓘ constitutional law case ⓘ public law case ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Miller
ⓘ
surface form:
Miller (No 1)
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ⓘ
surface form:
Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
|
| citation | [2017] UKSC 5 ⓘ |
| country | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2017-01-24 ⓘ |
| defendant | Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ⓘ |
| dissent | 3 ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Lord Carnwath
ⓘ
Lord Hughes ⓘ Lord Reed ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
|
| holding |
the Government could not lawfully trigger Article 50 TEU without prior authorisation by an Act of Parliament
ⓘ
the royal prerogative could not be used to change domestic law or nullify statutory rights without parliamentary approval ⓘ |
| isConsidered | one of the most significant UK constitutional cases of the early 21st century ⓘ |
| isLandmarkCaseIn | United Kingdom constitutional law ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| leadClaimant | Gina Miller ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
whether an Act of Parliament was required to notify the EU of the UK’s intention to withdraw
ⓘ
whether the UK Government could trigger Article 50 TEU using prerogative powers ⓘ |
| majority | 8 ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Baroness Hale of Richmond
ⓘ
surface form:
Lady Hale
Lord Clarke ⓘ Lord Hodge ⓘ Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore ⓘ
surface form:
Lord Kerr
Lord Mance ⓘ Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury ⓘ
surface form:
Lord Neuberger
Lord Sumption ⓘ Lord Wilson ⓘ |
| panelSize | 11 justices ⓘ |
| precededBy |
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
High Court decision in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)
|
| ratioDecidendi | withdrawing from the EU would inevitably lead to changes in domestic law and removal of statutory rights, which requires primary legislation ⓘ |
| relatedLegislation |
European Communities Act 1972
ⓘ
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 ⓘ European Union Referendum Act 2015 ⓘ |
| relatedTreaty | Treaty on European Union ⓘ |
| relatedTreatyArticle | Article 50 TEU ⓘ |
| resultedIn | requirement for Parliament to pass the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
Brexit
ⓘ
parliamentary sovereignty ⓘ royal prerogative ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2017 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Description of subject: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark 2017 UK Supreme Court case that held the government must obtain parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50 to leave the European Union.
Referenced by (9)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.