Triple

T12883255
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sewel Convention E308156 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union E187679 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union | Statement: [Sewel Convention, relatedCase, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
Context triple: [Sewel Convention, relatedCase, R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]
  • A. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union chosen
    R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark 2017 UK Supreme Court case that held the government must obtain parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50 to leave the European Union.
  • B. C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
    C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark Court of Justice of the European Union judgment that clarified that a Member State may unilaterally revoke its notification to withdraw from the EU under Article 50 TEU, provided the revocation is unequivocal and follows constitutional requirements.
  • C. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • D. R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd
    R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd is a landmark UK constitutional law case in which the House of Lords affirmed the supremacy of European Community law over conflicting domestic legislation and allowed for the suspension of an Act of Parliament.
  • E. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d970fd15888190baf90fc30f2a3e25 completed April 10, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6a5556fe081909ada9d491b21b17b completed May 3, 2026, 1:31 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:39 p.m.