Triple
T8051305
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union |
E187679
|
entity |
| Predicate | dissent |
P4522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 | Statement: [R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, dissent, 3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dissent Context triple: [R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, dissent, 3]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
chosen
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
dissentClaimed
Indicates that an entity has expressed disagreement or opposition to a claim made by another entity.
-
C.
mayDissentOn
Indicates that an entity has the option or permission to formally disagree with or oppose another entity’s decision, opinion, or action.
-
D.
dissentingOpinionConcern
Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
-
E.
disputed
Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b15e948190a62fd7af5218426a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3f7aab6481909d4a7cb9eabcd2af |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049a1b9c8190811c396421ebf9c9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:24 p.m.