Triple

T8051290
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union E187679 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union E187679 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union | Statement: [R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, alsoKnownAs, Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
Context triple: [R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, alsoKnownAs, Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union]
  • A. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union chosen
    R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark 2017 UK Supreme Court case that held the government must obtain parliamentary approval before triggering Article 50 to leave the European Union.
  • B. C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
    C-621/18 Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a landmark Court of Justice of the European Union judgment that clarified that a Member State may unilaterally revoke its notification to withdraw from the EU under Article 50 TEU, provided the revocation is unequivocal and follows constitutional requirements.
  • C. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • D. European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
    The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is a key UK law that provided the legal framework for leaving the EU by repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and converting existing EU law into domestic legislation.
  • E. Bancoult v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)
    Bancoult v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2) is a landmark 2008 House of Lords decision concerning the legality of the UK government's removal and exclusion of the Chagos Islanders from their homeland.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b15e948190a62fd7af5218426a completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3f799d1481909c91039941af0e34 completed March 31, 2026, 3:28 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cc571b737881909ae8eadcc7894223 completed March 31, 2026, 11:22 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:24 p.m.