Planned Parenthood v. Casey
E14374
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
All labels observed (5)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T60905 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Casey Context triple: [Roe v. Wade, hasRelatedCase, Planned Parenthood v. Casey]
-
A.
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
B.
Doe v. Bolton
Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.
-
C.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal constitutional right to abortion.
-
D.
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Casey Target entity description: Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
-
A.
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
B.
Doe v. Bolton
Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.
-
C.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal constitutional right to abortion.
-
D.
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
abortion rights case ⓘ landmark decision ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
reproductive rights ⓘ substantive due process ⓘ |
| citation | 505 U.S. 833 ⓘ |
| concurringInPartBy |
Harry A. Blackmun
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
Due Process Clause
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1992-06-29 ⓘ |
| defined | an undue burden exists if a regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking a pre-viability abortion ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Byron R. White ⓘ Clarence Thomas ⓘ William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| docketNumber |
91-744
ⓘ
91-902 ⓘ |
| fullName |
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
|
| held |
24-hour waiting period requirement is constitutional
ⓘ
informed consent requirements are largely constitutional ⓘ parental consent requirement with judicial bypass is constitutional ⓘ reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade ⓘ recognized a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion before fetal viability ⓘ spousal notification requirement for abortion is unconstitutional ⓘ states may regulate abortion before viability if regulations do not impose an undue burden ⓘ |
| impact |
became leading precedent on abortion regulation until 2022
ⓘ
shaped abortion jurisprudence through undue burden test ⓘ |
| involvedParty |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
ⓘ
Robert P. Casey ⓘ |
| issue | constitutionality of Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act provisions ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| legalStandardCreated | undue burden standard ⓘ |
| limited | trimester framework of Roe v. Wade ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
David H. Souter ⓘ Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
surface form:
Sandra Day O'Connor
|
| modified | Roe v. Wade ⓘ |
| overturnedInPartBy |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
ⓘ
surface form:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
|
| pluralityOpinionBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
David H. Souter ⓘ Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
surface form:
Sandra Day O'Connor
|
| reaffirmed | Roe v. Wade ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
ⓘ
surface form:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Roe v. Wade ⓘ |
| replaced | Roe v. Wade trimester framework with viability-based framework ⓘ |
| Robert P. CaseyRole | Governor of Pennsylvania ⓘ |
| stateOfOrigin | Pennsylvania ⓘ |
| term | 1991 Term ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Planned Parenthood v. Casey Description of subject: Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
Referenced by (28)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) U.S. Supreme Court decision
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
this entity surface form:
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey