Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Planned Parenthood v. Casey | Statement: [Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, precedentReliedOn, Planned Parenthood v. Casey]

Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Context triple: [Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, precedentReliedOn, Planned Parenthood v. Casey]

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Casey chosen
  Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
• B. Stenberg v. Carhart
  Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
• C. Roe v. Wade
  Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
• D. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• E. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: precedentReliedOn
Context triple: [Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, precedentReliedOn, Planned Parenthood v. Casey]

• A. precedentFor chosen
  Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
• B. precedentInterpreted
  Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
• C. precedentSystem
  Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
• D. hasCourtPrecedence
  Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
• E. typicalPrecedent
  Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
• F. None of above.