Triple
T15979561
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 |
E387536
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedToDecision |
P2457
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade |
E14374
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade | Statement: [Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, relatedToDecision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade Context triple: [Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, relatedToDecision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade]
-
A.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
chosen
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
-
B.
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade was a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a constitutional right to abortion, profoundly shaping American law and politics until it was overturned in 2022.
-
C.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
D.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
-
E.
Stenberg v. Carhart
Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedToDecision Context triple: [Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, relatedToDecision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade]
-
A.
associatedWithDecision
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular decision, such that the decision is relevant to, influenced by, or otherwise tied to that entity.
-
B.
relatedTo
Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
-
C.
decisionsConcern
Indicates that certain decisions are about, relate to, or focus on a particular subject, issue, or entity.
-
D.
relatedToClaimOf
Indicates a relationship where something is connected or pertinent to a specific claim or assertion.
-
E.
relatedToDebate
Indicates a relationship in which something is connected or relevant to a debate, discussion, or argumentative exchange.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da94ccc819083d187f5dc6a123e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e17d4d08f481909f38b75e3f42d9ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ffc3c9567c8190af87c3fcf8a4af15 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e142d9d8e881909b559a3e3ca21d24 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:54 a.m.