opinion in Rasul v. Bush
E140274
The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Rasul v. Bush | 3 |
| U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush | 1 |
| opinion in Rasul v. Bush canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1217788 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: opinion in Rasul v. Bush Context triple: [John Paul Stevens, notableWork, opinion in Rasul v. Bush]
-
A.
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.
-
B.
opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
-
C.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
D.
Hamdi
Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
-
E.
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: opinion in Rasul v. Bush Target entity description: The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
-
A.
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.
-
B.
opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
-
C.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
D.
Hamdi
Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
-
E.
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court majority opinion
ⓘ
judicial opinion ⓘ |
| author | John Paul Stevens ⓘ |
| characterization | landmark decision on habeas corpus and detainee rights ⓘ |
| citation | 542 U.S. 466 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy | Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ |
| constitutionalContext |
Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
surface form:
Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution
|
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| dateDecided | June 28, 2004 ⓘ |
| dissentingJustices |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 03-334 ⓘ |
| effect |
opened federal courts to habeas petitions from Guantánamo detainees
ⓘ
prompted the U.S. government to create Combatant Status Review Tribunals ⓘ |
| joinedBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
David H. Souter ⓘ Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal courts of the United States ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalHolding |
federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions filed by foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay
ⓘ
statutory habeas jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 extends to non‑citizens held at Guantánamo Bay ⓘ the degree of control the United States exercises over Guantánamo Bay is sufficient to trigger federal habeas jurisdiction ⓘ the habeas statute does not require that petitioners be U.S. citizens or held within sovereign territory of the United States ⓘ the precedent in Johnson v. Eisentrager does not bar habeas jurisdiction over Guantánamo detainees ⓘ |
| locationOfDetention |
U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay
ⓘ
surface form:
Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba
|
| overrulesOrLimits | Johnson v. Eisentrager (to the extent it was read to bar habeas for non‑citizens held outside U.S. sovereign territory) ⓘ |
| partOf |
opinion in Rasul v. Bush
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Rasul v. Bush
|
| petitioner |
Asif Iqbal
ⓘ
David Hicks ⓘ Mamdouh Habib ⓘ Shafiq Rasul ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
ⓘ
surface form:
Boumediene v. Bush
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ⓘ
surface form:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld ⓘ war on terror detainee litigation ⓘ |
| respondent |
Donald Rumsfeld
ⓘ
surface form:
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
George W. Bush ⓘ
surface form:
George W. Bush, President of the United States
U.S. military officials responsible for Guantánamo detention ⓘ |
| statutoryBasis |
28 U.S.C. § 1331
ⓘ
28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
habeas corpus jurisdiction
ⓘ
rights of foreign nationals detained in the war on terror ⓘ scope of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⓘ |
| topic |
extraterritorial application of U.S. law
ⓘ
separation of powers in wartime detention ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: opinion in Rasul v. Bush Description of subject: The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.