Triple

T12355242
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ex parte Quirin E294593 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Rasul v. Bush E140274 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rasul v. Bush | Statement: [Ex parte Quirin, relatedTo, Rasul v. Bush]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rasul v. Bush
Context triple: [Ex parte Quirin, relatedTo, Rasul v. Bush]
  • A. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that held American citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision-maker.
  • B. Bush v. Vera
    Bush v. Vera is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied and extended the racial gerrymandering principles from Shaw v. Reno to invalidate certain Texas congressional districts drawn predominantly on the basis of race.
  • C. Zivotofsky v. Clinton
    Zivotofsky v. Clinton is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of the political question doctrine by allowing courts to review a dispute over the recognition of Jerusalem in U.S. passports.
  • D. opinion in Rasul v. Bush chosen
    The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
  • E. Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6ccbec8190b09e2d357aa80064 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93f8bc60c8190b0ceb84093e70db4 completed April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f62ab4cdec8190849604ef2ec498ba completed May 2, 2026, 4:47 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.