Triple

T1707546
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GTMO E36903 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush E140274 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush | Statement: [GTMO, subjectOf, U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush
Context triple: [GTMO, subjectOf, U.S. Supreme Court case Rasul v. Bush]
  • A. opinion in Rasul v. Bush chosen
    The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
  • B. United States v. Edward Snowden
    United States v. Edward Snowden is the U.S. criminal case in which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden was charged for leaking classified surveillance documents, leading to international debates over government secrecy and privacy.
  • C. Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
    Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
  • D. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • E. Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aa62f6fc9c8190b61cc9872cc2adc0 completed March 6, 2026, 5:15 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad8ad849648190b2bb0e2a50cd6c75 completed March 8, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.