U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
E197844
Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
All labels observed (4)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1707548 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush Context triple: [GTMO, subjectOf, U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush]
-
A.
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
-
B.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
C.
opinion in Rasul v. Bush
The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
-
D.
United States v. Edward Snowden
United States v. Edward Snowden is the U.S. criminal case in which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden was charged for leaking classified surveillance documents, leading to international debates over government secrecy and privacy.
-
E.
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush Target entity description: Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
-
A.
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
-
B.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
C.
opinion in Rasul v. Bush
The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
-
D.
United States v. Edward Snowden
United States v. Edward Snowden is the U.S. criminal case in which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden was charged for leaking classified surveillance documents, leading to international debates over government secrecy and privacy.
-
E.
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to challenge the constitutionality of government surveillance conducted under the FISA Amendments Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
habeas corpus case ⓘ landmark decision ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAtTime | John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ |
| citation | 553 U.S. 723 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
surface form:
Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution
Suspension Clause ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2008-06-12 ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 06-1195 ⓘ |
| fullName |
U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
self-link
ⓘ
surface form:
Boumediene v. Bush
|
| held |
U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Section 7 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 is an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus
foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus in U.S. federal courts ⓘ Suspension Clause ⓘ
surface form:
the Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution has full effect at Guantánamo Bay
|
| impact |
constrained executive detention authority in the war on terror
ⓘ
expanded constitutional protections for noncitizens held at Guantánamo Bay ⓘ limited congressional power to strip federal courts of habeas jurisdiction ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
David H. Souter
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
application of the U.S. Constitution to Guantánamo Bay
ⓘ
habeas corpus rights of foreign detainees ⓘ suspension of the writ of habeas corpus ⓘ |
| locationInDispute |
Guantánamo
ⓘ
surface form:
Guantánamo Bay detention camp
|
| majorityOpinionBy | Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ |
| oralArgumentDate | 2007-12-05 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Lakhdar Boumediene ⓘ |
| precedentOverruledOrLimited | Johnson v. Eisentrager ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
ⓘ
surface form:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld ⓘ opinion in Rasul v. Bush ⓘ
surface form:
Rasul v. Bush
|
| relatedStatute |
Detainee Treatment Act of 2005
ⓘ
Military Commissions Act of 2006 ⓘ |
| respondent | George W. Bush ⓘ |
| result |
denial of the government’s motion to dismiss detainees’ habeas petitions
ⓘ
remand to lower courts for habeas proceedings ⓘ |
| termOfCourt | October Term 2007 ⓘ |
| topic |
executive power
ⓘ
national security law ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ war on terror ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2008 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush Description of subject: Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.