|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:60_U.S._(19_How.)_393
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1857-03-06
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
gptkb:Roger_B._Taney
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:John_F._A._Sandford
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_McLean
gptkb:Benjamin_Robbins_Curtis
|
|
gptkbp:followedBy
|
gptkb:14th_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:13th_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Congress could not prohibit slavery in U.S. territories
African Americans could not be American citizens
Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Dred Scott case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
increased tensions leading to the Civil War
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:leader
|
gptkb:Roger_B._Taney
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Roger_B._Taney
|
|
gptkbp:notableFor
|
one of the most infamous Supreme Court decisions
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Dred_Scott_v._Sandford
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:14th_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Dred_Scott
|
|
gptkbp:precededBy
|
gptkb:Scott_v._Emerson
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:American_Civil_War
gptkb:Missouri_Compromise
slavery in the United States
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:citizenship
gptkb:constitutional_law
slavery
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Dred_Scott_decision
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|