gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:area
|
election law
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 18, 1969
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
No. 69-1
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:majority_opinion
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil case
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 21, 1970
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
69-1
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for
|
political participation
election integrity
political accountability
voter engagement
candidate selection process
party governance
voter representation
party membership rights
political party structure
state control over elections
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
1960s political climate
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Cousins v. Wigoda
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:Constitution
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
First Amendment rights
Fourteenth Amendment rights
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Cousins
Wigoda
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
400 U. S. 100
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
reversed lower court decision
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
dispute over delegate selection
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
upheld party rules
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
gptkb:freedom_of_association
equal protection under the law
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
delegate selection process
party primaries
political party rights
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
affirmed the right of political parties to determine their own rules
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
party autonomy in elections
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Rucho_v._Common_Cause
gptkb:California_Democratic_Party_v._Jones
gptkb:Democratic_Party_of_the_United_States_v._Wisconsin
gptkb:Republican_Party_of_Minnesota_v._White
gptkb:Tashjian_v._Republican_Party_of_Connecticut
gptkb:Washington_State_Grange_v._Washington_State_Republican_Party
gptkb:Burdick_v._Takushi
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on state party rules
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1970
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Anderson_v._Celebrezze
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|