Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 53 U.S. 299 (1852)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	53 U.S. 299
gptkbp:CooleyDoctrine	States may regulate aspects of commerce that are local in nature unless preempted by federal law
gptkbp:date	1852
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:John_McLean gptkb:James_M._Wayne
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens_of_the_Port_of_Philadelphia
gptkbp:heldBy	States may regulate local aspects of interstate commerce in the absence of federal legislation
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 53 U.S. 299 (1852)
gptkbp:legalSubject	Commerce Clause federalism
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Benjamin_R._Curtis
gptkbp:plaintiff	Aaron B. Cooley
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Dormant_Commerce_Clause pilotage laws
gptkbp:significance	Established the Cooley Doctrine
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Cooley_Doctrine
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8