Cooley v. Board of Wardens

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	53 U.S. (12 How.) 299
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:John_McLean
gptkbp:courtMembership	gptkb:Taney_Court
gptkbp:date	1852
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:James_M._Wayne gptkb:John_Catron gptkb:Peter_V._Daniel
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens_of_the_Port_of_Philadelphia
gptkbp:hasDoctrine	gptkb:Dormant_Commerce_Clause
gptkbp:heldBy	States may regulate local aspects of commerce in the absence of federal regulation
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Cooley v. Board of Wardens
gptkbp:legalSystem	gptkb:U.S._Constitution_Article_I,_Section_8,_Commerce_Clause
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Benjamin_R._Curtis
gptkbp:numberOfIssues	gptkb:Dormant_Commerce_Clause
gptkbp:plotSummary	The Court upheld a Pennsylvania law requiring ships entering or leaving the port of Philadelphia to hire a local pilot or pay a fee.
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Gibbons_v._Ogden gptkb:Southern_Pacific_Co._v._Arizona
gptkbp:subject	State regulation of pilots
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Taney_Court gptkb:Cooley
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7