Conestoga Wood v. Burwell

URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Conestoga_Wood_v._Burwell

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corp._v._Sebelius
gptkbp:arguedDate	March 25, 2014
gptkbp:citation	573 U.S. 682 (2014)
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	June 30, 2014
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:docketNumber	13-356
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corp._v._Burwell
gptkbp:heldBy	Closely held for-profit corporations can be exempt from regulations that violate their owners' religious beliefs under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalBasis	gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Samuel_Alito gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:numberOfIssues	Whether the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when applied to closely held for-profit corporations
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corporation
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Sylvia_Burwell
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corporation,_et_al._v._Sylvia_Burwell,_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services,_et_al.
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Conestoga Wood v. Burwell