Civil Rights Cases (1883)

GPTKB entity

Statements (34)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation 109 U.S. 3
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date October 15, 1883
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionSummary John Marshall Harlan argued Congress had power to prohibit private racial discrimination under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments
gptkbp:effect Limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals
gptkbp:fullName United States v. Stanley, United States v. Ryan, United States v. Nichols, United States v. Singleton, Robinson et ux. v. Memphis & Charleston R.R. Co.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Civil Rights Cases (1883)
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:language English
gptkbp:legalHolding Congress lacked authority under the Thirteenth Amendment to regulate private acts of racial discrimination
Congress lacked authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to regulate private acts of racial discrimination
Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional as applied to private acts of discrimination
gptkbp:location gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Stanley_Matthews
gptkb:Stephen_Johnson_Field
gptkb:Joseph_P._Bradley
gptkb:Noah_Haynes_Swayne
gptkb:William_Burnham_Woods
gptkb:Morrison_Waite
gptkb:Samuel_Freeman_Miller
gptkb:Nathan_Clifford
gptkbp:overruledBy Civil Rights Act of 1964 (in effect)
gptkbp:predecessor gptkb:Jim_Crow_laws
gptkb:Plessy_v._Ferguson
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1875
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:subject gptkb:constitutional_law
Civil rights
Racial discrimination
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Reconstruction_Era
gptkbp:bfsLayer 4