Statements (60)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
Used as a case study in law schools
Relevant to discussions on educational equity Frequently discussed in legal circles Analyzed for its implications on future cases Evaluated for its impact on civil rights law |
gptkbp:case_documentation_source |
Available in Supreme Court records
|
gptkbp:case_number |
Documented in legal archives
No. 1, 1954 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
Influenced public policy on education
Set a precedent for future civil rights litigation Majority opinion by Justice William O. Douglas Struck down segregation in D. C. public schools Victory for civil rights advocates |
gptkbp:case_recognition |
Recognized as a pivotal case in U. S. history
|
gptkbp:case_significance |
Influenced future desegregation cases
Contextualized within the civil rights movement. Important for understanding civil rights history |
gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
|
gptkbp:community_impact |
Contributed to social change regarding race relations
|
gptkbp:consequences |
Implications for future civil rights legislation
|
gptkbp:court |
Sharpe
James Bolling |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
May 17, 1954 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Dissent_by_Justice_Tom_C._Clark
|
gptkbp:educational_value |
Influenced educational policies
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Analyzed in historical context of civil rights
|
gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Post-World_War_II_America
|
gptkbp:historical_significance |
Key case in the fight against segregation
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Bolling v. Sharpe
|
gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
347 U. S. 497 (1954)
|
gptkbp:judicial_outcome_description |
Judicial outcome that favored desegregation
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of segregation laws
Reasoning based on equality principles |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:District_of_Columbia
|
gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in civil rights law
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
Affirmed the unconstitutionality of segregation
Framework for evaluating segregation laws Impact on judicial attitudes towards segregation |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
School segregation
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional
End of de jure segregation in D. C. schools |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:NAACP_Legal_Defense_Fund
Constitutional law analysis |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
|
gptkbp:outcome |
Unconstitutional segregation in public schools
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Equal Protection Clause
Brown v. Board of Education ruling |
gptkbp:public_reaction |
Mixed reactions from the public
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:D._C._Board_of_Education
Influenced cases like Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education |
gptkbp:related_event |
gptkb:March_on_Washington
|
gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Discussed in law reviews
|
gptkbp:significance |
Landmark decision in education law
First case to apply the Equal Protection Clause to the District of Columbia |
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|