Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:argued_on |
October 14, 1957
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Discussed in legal forums
Examined in law school curricula Implications for state laws Subject of academic research papers Relevant to ongoing civil rights discussions |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_location |
Supreme Court archives
|
| gptkbp:case_impact_on_legislation |
Impact on future civil rights legislation
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
Appealed from lower court Available in legal archives 00-1234 Summarized in legal databases |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed lower court decision
Majority opinion published Detailed in legal textbooks Influenced legal strategies |
| gptkbp:case_relevance_to_current_law |
Relevant to current legal standards
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for civil rights movement
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil case
|
| gptkbp:community_impact |
Influenced public opinion on civil rights
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
affirmed January 12, 1958 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
Dissent published in case report |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:1958
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Post-World_War_II_America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Basilio v. Fullmer
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced civil rights legislation
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Fullmer
gptkb:Basilio Basilio and Fullmer |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:355_U._S._1
Frequently cited in legal arguments |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review of lower court ruling
Judicial review process involved |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:United_States_federal_court_system |
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in American jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Set precedent for future cases
Part of legal framework for civil rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Established legal protections
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
Equal protection under the law |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Attorneys for both parties
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Decision in favor of Fullmer |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established
Subsequent Supreme Court cases Cited in later Supreme Court rulings Legal standards for similar cases |
| gptkbp:public_interest |
High public interest in outcome
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Significant media coverage
|
| gptkbp:publications |
Published in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Discussed in legal journals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Addressed issues of due process
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2000
|