|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:530_U.S._466
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 26, 2000
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
99-478
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Charles_C._Apprendi,_Jr._v._New_Jersey
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Walton_v._Arizona
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause_of_the_Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_right_to_a_jury_trial
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Ring_v._Arizona
gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington
gptkb:United_States_v._Booker
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
criminal sentencing
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:2000_in_American_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Apprendi v. New Jersey
|