Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
GPTKB entity
Properties (63)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:advocatesFor |
patentability of software
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
invalidated claims
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
13-298
patent case |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
573 U.S. 208 (2014)
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
innovation in technology
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
patent claims not eligible |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
June 19, 2014
|
| gptkbp:field |
intellectual property
|
| gptkbp:foughtAgainst |
abstract ideas being patentable
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
|
| gptkbp:impact |
patent applications
software patents |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:Diamond_v._Chakrabarty
gptkb:Bilski_v._Kappos gptkb:Gottschalk_v._Benson |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Federal_Circuit_Court reaffirmed limitations on patentability |
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
unanimous
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
abstract idea exception
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
machine-or-transformation test
patent eligibility U.S._patent_law clarified_Section_101_of_the_Patent_Act |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
America Invents Act
Patent Act of 1952 |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark case
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
patents invalidated
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Alice_Corporation
gptkb:CLS_Bank_International |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice Clarence Thomas
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Alice/Mayo test
abstract ideas patent law interpretation |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories
intellectual property rights legal challenges case law legal standards intellectual property law court procedures judicial interpretation legal precedent court rulings patent litigation non-obviousness novelty utility patent examination process patent system legal analysis prior art legal implications patentable subject matter legal doctrines judicial review process patent claims patent office guidelines invention criteria legal_arguments |