Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
GPTKB entity
Statements (29)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:arguedDate |
March 31, 2014
|
| gptkbp:category |
landmark Supreme Court decision
|
| gptkbp:citation |
573 U.S. 208
573 U.S. 208 (2014) |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 19, 2014
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decision |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
13-298
|
| gptkbp:effect |
narrowed scope of patentable subject matter for software
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International et al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Implementing an abstract idea on a computer is not patent-eligible subject matter under Section 101.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International
|
| gptkbp:impact |
increased invalidation of software patents
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:US_patent
software patents Section 101 of the Patent Act |
| gptkbp:opinionBy |
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
Federal Circuit decision
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd.
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
patent eligibility of software inventions
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Laboratories,_Inc.
Bilski v. Kappos abstract ideas doctrine |
| gptkbp:response |
CLS Bank International
|
| gptkbp:subject |
computer-implemented inventions
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Section_101
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|