Statements (64)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
Often studied in law schools
Analyzed under the 14th Amendment Relevant to discussions on labor rights |
gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Majority opinion emphasized individual rights Declared unconstitutional provisions of the Erdman Act Affected labor union strategies Invalidated parts of the Erdman Act Limited federal power in labor disputes Majority opinion focused on economic freedoms Significant ruling in labor law history Struck down federal regulations on labor contracts |
gptkbp:case_significance |
Influenced labor relations policy
Significant for labor law evolution |
gptkbp:case_types |
Civil case
|
gptkbp:community_impact |
Shift in labor rights advocacy
|
gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future labor legislation.
Influenced the New Deal legislation Limited federal intervention in labor relations |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1918-01-15 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Holmes
gptkb:Justice_Clarke gptkb:Justice_Brandeis Justice Day |
gptkbp:historical_context |
Context of labor strikes and unrest
Post-World War I labor unrest |
gptkbp:historical_impact |
Long-term effects on labor law
|
gptkbp:historical_significance |
Foundation for labor law evolution
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Adair v. United States
|
gptkbp:influenced_by |
Progressive Era politics
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
Adair |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
245 U. S. 247
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review of federal power
Examined the limits of federal authority Review of federal authority over labor relations |
gptkbp:legal_context |
Early 20th century labor movement
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
Judicial restraint
Emphasized individual liberties Reaffirmed the principle of freedom of contract Set a precedent for future labor cases |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
Labor rights
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Reinforced individual contract rights
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
Freedom of contract
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Attorneys for Adair
Attorneys for the United States Examined under the Commerce Clause |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Act
|
gptkbp:notable_quote |
Justice Mc Reynolds' opinion
|
gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down a federal law
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent labor law cases
Set a legal precedent for future cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Mc_Reynolds
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:NLRB_v._Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corp.
gptkb:Meyer_v._Nebraska gptkb:Lochner_v._New_York |
gptkbp:significance |
Impact on labor unions
|
gptkbp:subsequent_interpretation |
Interpreted in later labor law cases
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_J._Field
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|