Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
2014-03-25
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
2014-06-30 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
573 U. S. 409
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influence on future cases regarding religious freedom
Contraceptive mandate exemption |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Sylvia_Burwell
gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
573 U. S. 409 (2014)
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Health care law
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Balancing religious rights and government interests
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Changes to contraceptive coverage policies
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Hobby Lobby's religious beliefs were protected
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Religious rights of corporations
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Zubik_v._Burwell
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Ethical considerations in law
Legal precedent for future cases Analysis of dissenting opinions Debate on religious freedom Debate on corporate personhood Public policy implications Impact on employee rights Judicial activism concerns Impact on religious organizations Impact on women's health rights Analysis of the court's reasoning Impact on religious minorities Legal ramifications for businesses Analysis of the RFRA Analysis of the majority opinion Corporate rights in the context of religion Debate on the role of government in healthcare Debate on women's reproductive rights Discussion on the limits of religious freedom Discussion on the nature of rights Discussion on the separation of church and state Future challenges to the ruling Impact on employer-provided health insurance Impact on the Affordable Care Act Implications for future healthcare laws Legal implications for small businesses Legal interpretations of the First Amendment Public opinion on the ruling |
| gptkbp:significance |
First case recognizing corporate personhood in religious matters
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Fifth_Third_Bancorp_v._Dudenhoeffer
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|