Statements (87)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
2004-12-07
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed the scope of the Confrontation Clause.
Implications for evidence admissibility. Relevant in discussions of constitutional rights. Whether statements were testimonial. |
| gptkbp:case_judicial_analysis_details |
Details of the judicial analysis.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_analysis_details_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial analysis details.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_details_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial outcome details.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_relevance |
Judicial relevance in constitutional law.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_relevance_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial relevance.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_relevance_details |
Details of the judicial relevance.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_relevance_details_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial relevance details.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_significance_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_significance_details |
Details of the judicial significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_significance_details_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial significance details.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_analysis |
Analysis of the legal arguments.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_details |
Details of the legal arguments.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_details_analysis |
Analysis of the legal arguments details.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_context_analysis |
Analysis of the legal context.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_context_analysis_details |
Details of the legal context analysis.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_context_details_analysis |
Analysis of the legal context details.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_impact_analysis |
Analysis of the legal impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_impact_details |
Details of the legal impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_impact_details_analysis |
Analysis of the legal impact details.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_analysis |
Analysis of the legal precedent.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_details |
Details of the legal precedent.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_details_analysis |
Analysis of the legal precedent details.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:Crawford_v._Washington
Appealed from Washington Supreme Court. Involved domestic violence. Involved statements made to police. No. 03-0207 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Details of the judicial outcome.
Defendant's rights upheld. The Confrontation Clause applies to testimonial statements. Defendant's right to confront witnesses upheld. Evidence admitted without confrontation is inadmissible. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Details of the legal significance.
Judicial significance in criminal law. Significant for the interpretation of the Sixth Amendment. Landmark case in hearsay law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
Arguments centered on hearsay. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced hearsay rules
Legal impact on hearsay and confrontation. Reformed evidentiary standards. |
| gptkbp:date |
2004-12-07
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:Majority_opinion |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
2009-03-31
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
557 U. S. 364
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:557_U._S._364
557 U. S. 364 (2009) |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment reversed.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Judicial review of state court decision. Outcome of judicial review was reversal. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Constitution
Details of the legal context surrounding the case. Context of the Sixth Amendment. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Details of the judicial impact.
Significant for criminal defendants. Impact on future hearsay cases. Judicial outcome favored the defendant. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Confrontation Clause
Legal arguments focused on confrontation rights. |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Conviction overturned.
Details of the legal outcome. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Testimonial evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Judicial analysis of testimonial statements.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed and remanded
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Right to confront witnesses
Set precedent for future cases. Established legal precedent for testimonial evidence. Crawford rule Judicial precedent established by the case. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Davis v. Washington
Michigan v. Bryant |
| gptkbp:significance |
Strengthened Sixth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Safford_Unified_School_District_v._Redding
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|