Properties (69)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Defendant's conviction was overturned.
The court ruled that the hearsay statements were inadmissible. Case studies available online. Critiques available in law reviews. Details of the outcome provided. Discussions available in legal blogs. Impact on evidentiary standards. Influence documented in legal analyses. Led to changes in how courts handle hearsay. Outcome detailed in court records. Significantly affected criminal procedure. Summary of case studies conducted. Summary of critiques received. Summary of discussions held. Summary of documentation available. Summary of influence noted. Summary of legacy established. Summary of the court's decision. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
No. 02-9410 Analysis available in legal journals. Relevant to constitutional law. Summary of analysis in legal studies. Summary of impact on legal practices. Summary of relevance in legal context. |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
541 U.S. 36
|
| gptkbp:court |
Right to a fair trial.
Appellate_court Reversed_the_decision_of_the_Washington_Court_of_Appeals. |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 8, 2004 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
December 8, 2003
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced the development of hearsay law.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Involved a domestic violence incident.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Crawford v. Washington
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Changed_the_interpretation_of_the_Confrontation_Clause.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Supreme_Court_review. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law.
Confrontation Clause Right to confront witnesses. Established a new standard for the admissibility of hearsay evidence. The use of hearsay violated the defendant's rights. Reaffirmed the importance of cross-examination. Set a precedent for future cases involving hearsay. Sixth_Amendment_of_the_U.S._Constitution. |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal databases.
Often studied in law schools. Frequently cited in legal arguments. Discussed in legal forums. Available in legal archives. Influenced legal standards for evidence. Relevant to discussions on evidentiary rules. Analyzed the balance between hearsay and confrontation rights. Critiqued_for_its_impact_on_victim_testimony. Key_case_in_the_interpretation_of_the_Confrontation_Clause. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Testimonial hearsay is inadmissible unless the witness is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.
|
| gptkbp:patentLink |
Legacy discussed in legal literature.
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Michael_Crawford
gptkb:State_of_Washington |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent cases regarding hearsay and confrontation rights.
Testimonial vs. non-testimonial statements. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Ohio_v._Roberts
Implications for defendants' rights. |
| gptkbp:research |
Hearsay evidence.
|
| gptkbp:team |
Legacy in the field of criminal law.
|