|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe,_528_U.S._119_(1999)
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Kennedy
|
|
gptkbp:constitution
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1999-05-17
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
98-97
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's law limiting welfare benefits for new residents violated the right to travel under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
528 U.S. 119
|
|
gptkbp:involvedState
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
119
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Saenz
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Roe
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
welfare benefits
right to travel
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
528
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Illinois_v._Wardlow
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|