Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 9, 1999
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed in law reviews
Used in law school curricula Impact on civil liberties discussions Critiqued for its implications on policing Discussed in civil rights forums Relevant in discussions of racial profiling Related to legislative discussions on police powers |
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_law |
Implications for law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:case_legality |
Examined legality of police actions
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Available in legal databases
Summarized in legal textbooks 98-1030 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Defendant's conviction overturned Reviewed in legal journals Influenced public perception of police practices Impacted community-police relations Led to changes in police training protocols Wardlow's actions deemed sufficient for stop |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Addressed police authority in public spaces
Part of the evolution of Fourth Amendment law |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 20, 2000 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens, Scalia |
| gptkbp:held_in |
Flight in a high-crime area can be considered suspicious
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Illinois v. Wardlow
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced law enforcement training
Stop and frisk policies |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Wardlow,_Illinois_police
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Frequently cited in legal arguments
Cited in Supreme Court opinions 528 U. S. 119 |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices O' Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
United States federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Part of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Contributed to the legal framework of reasonable suspicion.
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Reversed and remanded
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Reasonable suspicion standard
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined the balance between safety and rights
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Terry stop
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved a stop and search incident
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
Set precedent for future Fourth Amendment cases Influenced future cases on police stops |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:publications |
Published in various legal commentaries
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Florida_v._J._L.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified standards for reasonable suspicion
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|