limitedByCourtCase

P8832
predicate

Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.

Try in SPARQL

All labels observed (8)

Label Occurrences
laterLimitedBy 10
limitedByCourtCase canonical 2
limitedByDecision 2

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: limitedByCourtCase
Generated description
Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.

Sample triples (21)

Subject Object
Religious Freedom Restoration Act City of Boerne v. Flores ⓘ
Enabling Act of 1933 yes via predicate surface "limitedJudicialReview" ⓘ
Civil Rights Act of 1875 Civil Rights Cases ⓘ
linked to: Civil Rights Act of 1875
Voting Rights Act of 1965 Shelby County v. Holder (2013) via predicate surface "affectedByCourtDecision" ⓘ
linked to: Shelby County v. Holder
Sherbert v. Verner Employment Division v. Smith via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Paul v. Virginia United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
linked to: Section 4(b)
June 25, 2013 via predicate surface "limitedByDecisionOn" ⓘ
Maryland v. Wirtz National League of Cities v. Usery via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Corrigan v. Buckley Shelley v. Kraemer via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Corrigan v. Buckley Hurd v. Hodge via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation Cooper v. Aaron via predicate surface "limitedByDecision" ⓘ
Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County via predicate surface "limitedByDecision" ⓘ
Malloy v. Hogan Adamson v. California via predicate surface "limitedOrRejectedPrecedent" ⓘ
Stenberg v. Carhart Gonzales v. Carhart via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
South African Constitution of 1983 yes via predicate surface "limitedJudicialReview" ⓘ
Myers v. United States Humphrey’s Executor v. United States via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Regents of the University of California v. Bakke via predicate surface "limitedPrecedent" ⓘ
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin via predicate surface "limitedPrecedent" ⓘ
Goldman v. United States Katz v. United States via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
Goldman v. United States shift to privacy-based Fourth Amendment doctrine via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ
De donis conditionalibus Fines and Recoveries Act 1833 via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" ⓘ