|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
pro-life vs pro-choice
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:cultural_impact
|
influenced art and media
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
|
|
gptkbp:government_response
|
state-level abortion laws
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
gptkb:women's_liberation_movement
1970s America
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
landmark abortion case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
women's reproductive rights
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
gptkb:social_movements
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Warren_Burger
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:William_Brennan
gptkb:Lewis_Powell
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
informed consent
parental consent
waiting periods
abortion access
reproductive justice
abortion statistics
abortion funding
abortion regulations
medical necessity
abortion laws
abortion rights advocacy
abortion bans
compelling state interest
abortion counseling
abortion policy
viability
fetal rights
undue burden
abortion methods
gestational limits
conscience clauses
abortion clinics
abortion procedures
abortion stigma
health exceptions
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
right to privacy
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
trimester framework
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent abortion legislation
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
polarized views
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt
gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
abortion rights
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established legal precedents
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:1973
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Carhart_v._Gonzalez
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|