|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
discretionary injunctions
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2006
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:2006
|
|
gptkbp:established
|
standards for injunctions
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
e Bay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L. L. C.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
patent law
affects patent law
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
subsequent cases
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:e_Bay_Inc.
gptkb:Merc_Exchange,_L._L._C.
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
547 U. S. 388
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
injunction standards
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
permanent injunction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
rejection of automatic injunctions
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
four-factor test for injunctions
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Supreme Court ruled in favor of e Bay
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
future patent cases
e Bay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L. L. C. established standards for injunctions
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
intellectual property law
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
public interest
irreparable harm
influenced future patent litigation cases
adequate remedy at law
balance of hardships
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
gptkb:Federal_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|