e Bay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L. L. C.
GPTKB entity
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
gptkb:Federal_Circuit |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2006
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:2006
|
| gptkbp:established |
standards for injunctions
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
e Bay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L. L. C.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
patent law
affects patent law |
| gptkbp:influenced |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
547 U. S. 388
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:e_Bay_Inc.
gptkb:Merc_Exchange,_L._L._C. |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
injunction standards
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
permanent injunction
four-factor test for injunctions |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme Court ruled in favor of e Bay
discretionary injunctions rejection of automatic injunctions |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future patent cases
e Bay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L. L. C. established standards for injunctions |
| gptkbp:related_to |
intellectual property law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
public interest
irreparable harm influenced future patent litigation cases adequate remedy at law balance of hardships |