|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
118 U.S. 356
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
May 10, 1886
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Hopkins
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Yick_Wo_v._Hopkins,_118_U.S._356_(1886)
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Laws that are race-neutral on their face but administered in a prejudicial manner violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:San_Francisco,_California
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Stanley_Matthews
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Yick_Wo
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
cases involving discriminatory law enforcement
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Equal protection applies to all persons, not just citizens.
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
Chinese laundry owners
discriminatory enforcement of ordinances
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
racial discrimination
due process
|
|
gptkbp:unanimousDecision
|
true
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
|