Properties (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
constitutional law case |
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Washington_Supreme_Court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Washington v. Harper
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future cases on inmate rights
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
informed consent
fundamental rights treatment efficacy judicial oversight individual autonomy administrative discretion affirmed lower court's ruling strict scrutiny competency to stand trial substantive due process right to refuse treatment government interest mental health care access mental health treatment standards least restrictive means rational basis review mental health evaluation balancing test for rights procedural due process rights of the mentally ill mental competency standards mental health treatment in prisons due process in corrections ethical considerations in treatment 179 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 1999) constitutional protections for inmates due process in involuntary treatment informed consent in corrections inmate treatment protocols involuntary medication judicial review of treatment decisions prison administration policies prisoner's rights state's duty to care state's interest in rehabilitation state's police power treatment refusal rights inmate_welfare |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the state's ability to medicate inmates
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Washington_State_Department_of_Corrections
Harper_(inmate) |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
related to mental health law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Sell_v._United_States
gptkb:Riggins_v._Nevada |
| gptkbp:significance |
due process rights
|
| gptkbp:state |
treatment of mental illness
maintaining prison safety |
| gptkbp:year |
1999
|