Washington v. Glucksberg

GPTKB entity

Statements (96)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:argued_on October 7, 1996
right to die
gptkbp:case_analysis bioethics discussions
Analyzed under the Due Process Clause
Relevant in discussions of medical ethics
constitutional limits on personal choices
individual autonomy vs. state interests
liberty interests
gptkbp:case_number Brought by physicians and terminally ill patients
Involved multiple plaintiffs challenging the law
legal challenges to assisted suicide laws
gptkbp:case_outcome 5-4 decision
reaffirmed state power
The majority opinion was critical of the right to die argument
States can prohibit assisted suicide
The decision was seen as a victory for state rights.
future legislation on end-of-life issues
narrow interpretation of rights
not a constitutional right
not a fundamental right
rejected broad interpretation of personal liberties
gptkbp:case_significance Influenced public policy on end-of-life issues
shaped future legal discussions
gptkbp:case_types Constitutional law case
gptkbp:consequences state autonomy
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Involved a conservative majority on the Court
gptkbp:court's_stance strict scrutiny
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:1997
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
5-4 ruling
June 26, 1997
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Argued for individual autonomy
gptkbp:effect_on_public_policy healthcare decisions
gptkbp:historical_context Part of a broader discussion on euthanasia
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Washington v. Glucksberg
gptkbp:impact Influenced laws regarding assisted suicide in the U. S.
Led to further legal challenges regarding assisted suicide
state legislation on assisted suicide
gptkbp:influenced_by historical context of assisted suicide laws
gptkbp:is_cited_in 521 U. S. 702 (1997)
521 U. S. 702
gptkbp:judicial_consensus limited personal liberties
gptkbp:judicial_review historical practices
constitutional interpretation
Reviewed Washington's law on assisted suicide
gptkbp:jurisdiction United States federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legal_context gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
constitutional rights
Right to die debate
assisted dying laws
gptkbp:legal_framework right to privacy
upheld state law
originalism
due process clause
Influenced state legislation on assisted dying
Part of the constitutional law framework in the U. S.
gptkbp:legal_issue assisted suicide
Right to assisted suicide
Involved arguments about liberty and state interests
Debate over personal choice vs. state regulation
moral implications of assisted suicide
gptkbp:legal_outcome Reaffirmed states' rights to regulate medical practices
The ruling limited the scope of personal liberties
no constitutional right to assisted suicide
gptkbp:legal_principle substantive due process
No constitutional right to assisted suicide
gptkbp:legal_reasoning historical traditions
gptkbp:legal_scholars'_view important for personal liberty cases
gptkbp:outcome The Court upheld the state's ban on assisted suicide
upheld state ban on assisted suicide
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
Substantive due process
Washington v. Glucksberg established limits on personal liberties
Set a precedent for future cases on personal liberties
fundamental rights analysis
gptkbp:propulsion gptkb:Harold_Glucksberg
gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
Emphasized state interests in preserving life
assisted suicide debate
gptkbp:public_reaction Controversial and widely debated
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:Gonzales_v._Oregon
gptkb:Cruzan_v._Director,_Missouri_Department_of_Health
gptkbp:significance Clarified the standard for substantive due process rights
limits on personal liberties
gptkbp:state_interest protecting vulnerable populations
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:14th_Amendment
gptkbp:bfsLayer 4