Properties (144)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
03-441
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Influenced state-level redistricting efforts.
Critiques from civil rights organizations. Debated in legislative contexts. Electoral impact on congressional representation. Electoral justice considerations. Electoral outcomes influenced by judicial rulings. Electoral outcomes influenced by the case. Followed by further litigation on gerrymandering. Future litigation on gerrymandering issues. Impacted state-level redistricting laws. Judicial impact on state election laws. Judicial outcomes affecting elections. Judicial outcomes affecting electoral processes. Judicial philosophy regarding electoral fairness. Led to calls for redistricting reform. Legal challenges to redistricting practices. Opposed by liberal legal scholars. Partisan gerrymandering claims were dismissed. Political outcomes from judicial decisions. Political outcomes from the ruling. Public discourse on gerrymandering. Public policy implications for gerrymandering. Responses from advocacy groups. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law case.
03-441 Calls for electoral reform. Consequences for electoral representation. Electoral frameworks for fair representation. Electoral integrity discussions. Electoral philosophies on fairness. Electoral principles of democracy. Electoral standards for democracy. Frequently discussed in political science. Future implications for electoral law. Judicial decisions impacting electoral law. Judicial frameworks for evaluating elections. Judicial philosophies regarding electoral issues. Judicial principles guiding electoral cases. Judicial review standards for electoral cases. Judicial standards for electoral fairness. Legal frameworks for electoral processes. No. 03-441 Political debates surrounding redistricting. Political frameworks for representation. Political justice considerations. Political philosophies on representation. Political principles in electoral representation. Political reform discussions. Political standards for representation. Reactions from political parties. Democratic_principles_at_stake. |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
541 U.S. 267
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
Partisan advantage in redistricting.
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Rehnquist_Court
Published in various legal journals. The court did not find a constitutional violation. Republican_voters Pennsylvania_state_officials |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 2004 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 26, 2004
December 9, 2003 |
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced the 2010 redistricting process
Influenced the development of gerrymandering law. |
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Impact on future electoral districting.
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Legal precedents established.
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalStatus |
Legal standards for evaluating district maps.
|
| gptkbp:hasPoliticalParty |
Political impact on state legislatures.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Impact on state legislatures
Impact on minority representation Comparative analysis with other democracies Constitutional interpretation of gerrymandering Effect on voter representation Extensively analyzed in law reviews. Future of redistricting litigation Implications for electoral fairness Judicial restraint in political matters Legal standards for evaluating gerrymandering Political implications of the ruling Public perception of gerrymandering Role of courts in political disputes Role of technology in redistricting |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Part of a larger historical debate on redistricting.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Vieth v. Jubelirer
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future gerrymandering cases.
Influenced future gerrymandering cases |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_David_Souter 4-5 Judicial standards can be applied to partisan gerrymandering. Supreme_Court's_role_in_electoral_processes. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
United_States_federal_jurisdiction. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Debate over judicial standards for gerrymandering
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Gerrymandering
Set a precedent for future gerrymandering cases. Addressed the constitutionality of districting maps. Evolving standards of redistricting. Redistricting after the 2000 Census Addressed the limits of judicial intervention in political processes |
| gptkbp:localLegends |
Legal scholarship on electoral law.
|
| gptkbp:notableArtists |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_David_Souter Justice Stephen Breyer |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Voting_Rights_Act.
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal archives.
Criticized for lack of clear standards. Examined for its implications on democracy. Influenced public policy on redistricting. Relevant in discussions of electoral reform. Supported by conservative legal scholars. Highlighted the tension between state and federal authority in elections. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_that_partisan_gerrymandering_claims_are_non-justiciable.
Court_ruled_on_the_justiciability_of_partisan_gerrymandering |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy 5-4 |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Partisan gerrymandering claims are non-justiciable
Limits on judicial intervention in partisan gerrymandering cases. |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial among legal scholars and political analysts.
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Rucho_v._Common_Cause
gptkb:Gill_v._Whitford gptkb:League_of_United_Latin_American_Citizens_v._Perry gptkb:Bush_v._Vera Equal Protection Clause Equal protection clause. Political question doctrine Judicial restraint. Common Cause v. Rucho Raised questions about electoral fairness. First_Amendment_rights Gonzalez_v._Arizona. |
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Pennsylvania
|
| gptkbp:team |
Legal implications for future cases.
Continues to influence gerrymandering debates. Legal debate on the role of courts in elections. Legal implications for future electoral cases. Part of the legal framework governing elections. |
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4 decision
No judicially manageable standards for resolving partisan gerrymandering. |