Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
No definitive ruling on gerrymandering
No clear standard established Remanded for further proceedings |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil rights case
16-1161 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Future redistricting efforts
|
| gptkbp:court |
Democratic voters
Standing to sue Split decision Partisan gerrymandering Wisconsin_state_officials |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 18, 2018 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
October 3, 2017
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
State-level redistricting reforms
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Impact on electoral fairness
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Filed in 2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Gill v. Whitford
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Redistricting cases
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito Constitutionality of district maps |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
Gerrymandering Remanded to lower court Unconstitutional dilution of votes Impact_on_future_Supreme_Court_decisions Political_climate_in_Wisconsin |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Influence on future cases
Implications for democracy |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_on_standing
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Scott_Whitford
gptkb:William_Gill |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Vieth_v._Jubelirer
Judicial standards for gerrymandering |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Debate on gerrymandering
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Rucho_v._Common_Cause
Voting rights Constitutional interpretation Judicial review Electoral integrity Political equality Judicial activism Voter disenfranchisement Equal protection clause Judicial restraint Political question doctrine First_Amendment_rights Justiciability |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Wisconsin_legislative_map
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Political representation
|