Vernonia School District v. Acton
GPTKB entity
Statements (40)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
Changes in school athletic policies
Debate over student privacy rights Increased drug testing in schools Legal challenges to drug testing policies Legislation on school drug testing |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
Public policy Tort law Administrative law Education law Civil rights law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
515 U.S. 646
|
| gptkbp:context |
Public school policies
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 1995 |
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Influenced_future_Supreme_Court_rulings
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Vernonia School District v. Acton
|
| gptkbp:impact |
School drug policies
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Due Process Clause Fourth Amendment Drug testing of student-athletes School_District's_legal_counsel |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Drug-Free_Schools_and_Communities_Act
No Child Left Behind Act |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Upheld random drug testing policy
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Vernonia_School_District
James_Acton |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Student athletes can be subjected to drug testing
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Opposition from civil liberties groups
Mixed opinions on drug testing Support from parents and school officials |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:New_Jersey_v._T.L.O.
gptkb:Board_of_Education_v._Earls |
| gptkbp:significance |
Set precedent for student privacy rights
|