Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced future cases
affirmed lower court ruling set precedent for future rulings shaped drug policy in schools |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
01-332 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
constitutional |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 2002 |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed_from_Tenth_Circuit
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Board of Education v. Earls
|
| gptkbp:impact |
student privacy rights
increased drug testing policies |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
4 justices |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
administrative efficiency
upheld school authority reasonable suspicion standard drug testing in schools government interest in student safety minimal intrusion on privacy school safety concerns student drug use prevention Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
lack of empirical evidence
landmark decision concerns over privacy violations ongoing debates on student rights potential for abuse of power 536 U.S. 822 balancing student privacy and safety disproportionate impact on students drug testing for extracurricular activities questionable effectiveness of drug testing |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld drug testing policy
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Board_of_Education
Brittany_Earls |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice Clarence Thomas
5 justices |
| gptkbp:precedent |
school drug testing policies
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:New_Jersey_v._T.L.O.
gptkb:Vernonia_School_District_v._Acton student rights search and seizure administrative searches influenced legislation on school policies public school authority |
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|