Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
15-10001 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
823 F.3d 1180
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Zuniga
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced_Fourth_Amendment_interpretations
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Zuniga |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Mary_H._Murguia
gptkb:Judge_Andrew_D._Hurwitz gptkb:Judge_Richard_R._Clifton |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
constitutional law case law criminal justice system public defender reasonable expectation of privacy upheld lower court's decision federal appellate law precedent law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
involved illegal search
involved legal arguments involved constitutional rights involved legal standards involved appellate review involved judicial reasoning important for criminal procedure involved constitutional protections involved defendant's appeal involved defendant's rights involved drug offenses involved evidence suppression involved law enforcement conduct involved police investigation involved trial court ruling |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
guidelines for search warrants |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio gptkb:Katz_v._United_States gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Fourth Amendment
search and seizure |
| gptkbp:research |
physical evidence
testimonial evidence |
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
April 12, 2016
|