United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Company
GPTKB entity
Statements (55)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 1
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
355 U.S. 634
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 2, 1959 |
gptkbp:filedIn |
November 10, 1958
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Company
|
gptkbp:impact |
railroad mergers
regulatory practices competition in transportation |
gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Western_Pacific_Railroad_Company |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black gptkb:Justice_Earl_Warren gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
joint ventures antitrust laws price discrimination tying arrangements burden of proof market power monopolization antitrust enforcement antitrust policy consumer welfare standard market definition rule of reason merger guidelines predatory pricing per se illegality exclusive dealing efficiency defense antitrust exemptions horizontal restraints remedies in antitrust cases vertical restraints antitrust injury conspiracy to restrain trade international antitrust law federal_antitrust_laws Western_Pacific_Railroad_Company_legal_team state_antitrust_laws |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed
|
gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent antitrust cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Company
gptkb:United_States_v._Penn_Central_Transportation_Company |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on railroad industry
interpretation of antitrust laws |
gptkbp:year |
1959
|