United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
GPTKB entity
Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
December 1907
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
important for legal scholars
impact on economic policy influenced future court decisions important for understanding federalism affected transportation policies examined the balance of state and federal powers important case in administrative law influenced regulatory practices in the U. S. |
| gptkbp:case_number |
involved economic regulation
dispute over railroad rates |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
upheld federal authority
set a precedent for future cases expanded federal powers upheld the Interstate Commerce Commission's authority clarified the role of the ICC strengthened federal regulatory framework upheld the ICC's rate-setting authority |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
shaped future regulatory policies
landmark case in U. S. legal history |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
1908
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
federal preemption
established principles of administrative law |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
January 1908
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Progressive Era reforms
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
|
| gptkbp:impact |
railroad industry regulations
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Company |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
215 U. S. 207
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Taft gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
review of administrative decisions
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
early 20th century regulatory environment
interpretation of federal powers |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
federal regulation of interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
affirmed regulatory authority
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
commerce clause
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
interpretation of the commerce clause
|
| gptkbp:material |
involved issues of public interest
arose from disputes over freight rates |
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
transportation law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
regulation of railroads
established standards for regulation |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on federal regulation
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._New_York_Central_Railroad_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|