|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1971-03-01
1971-02-23
1971-03-02
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
402 U.S. 62
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1971-04-21
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
|
gptkbp:followedBy
|
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Milan_Vuitch
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The burden of proof that an abortion was not necessary is on the prosecution.
The term 'health' in the D.C. abortion statute was not unconstitutionally vague.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Vuitch
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_John_M._Harlan_II
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
abortion law
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:precededBy
|
gptkb:Griswold_v._Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
first abortion case decided by the Supreme Court
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Milan_Vuitch
|
|
gptkbp:statuteInterpreted
|
District of Columbia abortion statute
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
constitutionality of abortion statutes
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|