Properties (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
Increased enrollment of women in military academies
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Influenced other military institutions
Summary_of_the_Supreme_Court's_decision. VMI_had_to_adapt_its_programs_for_women VMI_must_comply_with_federal_law |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil rights case
95-198 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
518 U.S. 515
|
| gptkbp:court |
Ruling favored the inclusion of women
Appellate_court Unconstitutional_to_exclude_women_from_VMI |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 1996 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 20, 1996
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Part of the women's rights movement
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Originated_from_a_lawsuit_against_VMI
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Virginia
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Increased access for women in military institutions
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Majority opinion emphasized equal protection Judicial review of state policies Argued_that_VMI's_single-sex_status_was_justified VMI's_admission_policy_was_unconstitutional |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:William_C._Hurd Gender discrimination Affirmed the application of intermediate scrutiny Arguments centered on gender discrimination Intermediate scrutiny standard VMI_must_create_a_program_for_women |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Title_IX_of_the_Education_Amendments_of_1972
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Documented in legal archives
Influenced public policy on gender issues Link to case documentation and opinions Relevant to discussions on gender roles Significant for gender equality in education Summary of the case's legal arguments and outcomes Analyzed_under_the_Equal_Protection_Clause |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Virginia_Military_Institute_must_admit_women
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
7-1 |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Equal protection under the law
Set precedent for future gender discrimination cases |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from the public
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Mississippi_University_for_Women_v._Hogan
Implications for single-sex education policies |
| gptkbp:significance |
Landmark case in gender equality
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Virginia
|
| gptkbp:team |
Set a precedent for gender equality in education
|