|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
gptkb:2021
transcripts available
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
discussed in legal forums
cited in future cases
affects future prosecutions
lawyers and scholars
to criminal justice system
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_civil_rights
|
affects civil liberties discussions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_constitutional_law
|
interprets constitutional provisions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_defendants
|
clarifies legal standards
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_human_rights
|
influences human rights advocacy.
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_international_law
|
discussed in global legal contexts
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_judges
|
informs judicial decisions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_law_enforcement
|
guides police practices
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_education
|
used in law school curricula
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_ethics
|
raises ethical questions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_scholars
|
provides research material
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_prosecutors
|
guides future prosecutions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_public_policy
|
influences legislative changes
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
available online
available in legal databases
available in court records
20-1459
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
significant for defendants
important for legal precedents
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
clarified legal standards
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
November 2020
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
unanimous
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:none
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
20-1459
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
July 2, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:historical_period
|
documented in legal history
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Taylor
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
United States, Taylor
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
142 S. Ct. 2015
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
Justices of the Supreme Court
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
Supreme Court review
explained in opinions
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
federal criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
federal statutes
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
federal law interpretation
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
interpretation of statutes
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
scholarly articles published
attorneys for both sides
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
criminal procedure
discuss implications
|
|
gptkbp:material
|
involves criminal charges
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed lower court decision
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
influences future cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high profile case
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Davis
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|