United States v. Stevens (2010)

GPTKB entity

Statements (26)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate October 6, 2009
gptkbp:citation 559 U.S. 460
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy Samuel Alito (in part, dissenting in part)
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date April 20, 2010
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:decision Opinion of the Court
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber 08-769
gptkbp:heldBy 18 U.S.C. § 48 is substantially overbroad, and therefore invalid under the First Amendment.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Stevens (2010)
gptkbp:legalIssue Is 18 U.S.C. § 48, which criminalizes the commercial creation, sale, or possession of certain depictions of animal cruelty, facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
gptkbp:overturnedStatute gptkb:18_U.S.C._§_48
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:predecessor First Amendment overbreadth doctrine
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
gptkb:Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchants_Association
gptkbp:response gptkb:Robert_J._Stevens
gptkbp:subject gptkb:First_Amendment
Freedom of speech
Animal cruelty depictions
gptkbp:votingSystem 8-1
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:18_U.S.C._§_48
gptkbp:bfsLayer 7