|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 17, 1970
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
No. 70-1
involved issues of censorship and free expression.
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
affirmed lower court's decision
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
influenced future obscenity cases
significant impact on media law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 25, 1971
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
Justice Blackmun's dissent
Justice Stewart's dissent
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:1971
|
|
gptkbp:historical_significance
|
landmark case in free speech law
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Reed
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_judicial_thinking
|
judicial interpretation of the First Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
gptkb:404_U._S._1
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
free speech protections
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
expanded First Amendment protections
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:freedom_of_expression
gptkb:First_Amendment
obscenity
shaped public discourse on free speech
led to changes in obscenity laws
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
ruled in favor of Reed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
set standards for future cases
established standards for obscenity
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
Justice Douglas's majority opinion
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:New_York_v._Ferber
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
gptkb:United_States_v._Alvarez
gptkb:Miller_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._Williams
gptkb:Reno_v._ACLU
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
impact on free speech
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|