Statements (39)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Upholding state law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
80-1772 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
458 U.S. 747
|
| gptkbp:court |
Affirmed lower court's ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1982-06-21 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
1981-12-08
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Extensive legal commentary
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-1970s child protection movement
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
New York v. Ferber
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state laws on child pornography
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall, Stevens Supreme_Court_review Influenced_future_Supreme_Court_rulings |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:New_York_Attorney_General
1981-12-08 Child pornography laws Impact on First Amendment jurisprudence Constitutional validation of state law Strict scrutiny for child pornography laws First_Amendment_rights Miller_test_application |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Strengthened child pornography laws
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Clarified limits of free speech
Involved child pornography and free speech issues. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Upheld_the_constitutionality_of_New_York's_child_pornography_statute
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
New_York_State_and_Paul_Ferber
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Rehnquist,_White,_O'Connor,_Powell,_Burger |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Regulation of obscene materials
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
gptkb:Miller_v._California Obscenity, child protection laws |
| gptkbp:significance |
Established precedent for regulating child pornography
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|