Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:affects |
Child protection laws
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1981-12-08
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Originated in New York state courts
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Influenced public policy on child exploitation Constitutional ruling Constitutional affirmation Majority opinion upheld state law Upheld state law against First Amendment challenge |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Important for First Amendment jurisprudence
Significant for child protection advocacy Significant for legal standards on obscenity. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Rehnquist_Court
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1982-06-21 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
Dissent argued against state law |
| gptkbp:election |
5-4
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Influenced future child protection legislation
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
New York v. Ferber
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state laws on child exploitation
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
New York State and Paul Ferber
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
458 U. S. 747
Cited in future legal cases |
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Strict scrutiny
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment favored state law enforcement
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutionality of state laws
Constitutional review of state law Outcome upheld state law |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
First Amendment rights
Context of First Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Strengthened child pornography laws
Framework for child pornography regulation Framework for evaluating obscenity Impact on future child pornography legislation Interpreted constitutional rights Set legal standards for child pornography |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Child pornography laws
Arguments for and against state law Child protection vs. free speech Debated obscenity and child welfare |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Constitutional validation of child protection laws
Constitutional validation of state statutes |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined balance between free speech and child protection
|
| gptkbp:material |
Involved prosecution of child pornography distributor
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Upheld the constitutionality of New York's child pornography statute
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established limits on free speech
Regulation of obscene materials Regulation of child pornography upheld |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
gptkb:Miller_v._California |
| gptkbp:significance |
Established precedent for regulating child pornography
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Miller_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._Reed |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|