Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:addressed |
legal textbooks
|
| gptkbp:analyzes |
constitutional law scholars
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
96-511
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
521 U.S. 844
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
David Boies
March 19, 1997 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
June 26, 1997
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
emergence of the internet
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Reno v. ACLU
|
| gptkbp:impact |
online content regulation
youth access to online content |
| gptkbp:influenced |
advocacy for digital rights
previous cases on obscenity and free speech public perception of internet regulation public policy on internet censorship future_Supreme_Court_decisions_on_free_speech |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Janet_Reno
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union debates on internet governance |
| gptkbp:is_part_of |
First_Amendment_jurisprudence
landmark_Supreme_Court_decisions legal_history_of_the_United_States. |
| gptkbp:is_used_in |
civil liberties organizations
law school curricula numerous legal arguments regarding online speech media coverage of free speech issues |
| gptkbp:issue |
First_Amendment_rights
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Constitutionality of laws affecting speech |
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:lastProduced |
gptkb:Ashcroft_v._ACLU
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Content-based restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny.
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Communications Decency Act of 1996
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Child Online Protection Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
internet law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
invalidated_provisions_of_the_CDA
struck_down_Communications_Decency_Act |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent internet regulation cases
|
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
analyze implications of the ruling
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
digital rights advocacy
free speech protections digital privacy issues First_Amendment_challenges |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case for internet free speech
|