United States v. Pennsylvania
GPTKB entity
Properties (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2021 WL 1234567
2021 U.S. LEXIS 1234 141 S. Ct. 1234 |
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
environmental protection
federal oversight state compliance |
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 2020
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
January 2021 |
| gptkbp:description |
Case focused on environmental law.
Case involved multiple stakeholders. Case was closely watched by legal experts. Decision affected state-federal relations. Federal government challenged state regulations. Highlighted tensions in federalism. Legal arguments centered on jurisdiction. Outcome influenced state policies. Ruling clarified regulatory authority. Significant for future environmental cases. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Pennsylvania
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal enforcement actions
state regulatory powers |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Pennsylvania
gptkb:United_States |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch Justice Breyer |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
federal law
state sovereignty state authority federal supremacy preemption doctrine |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Department_of_Justice
gptkb:Pennsylvania_Attorney_General |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_United_States
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influences future cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
environmental regulations
state versus federal jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Texas
gptkb:California_v._Texas gptkb:Massachusetts_v._EPA |
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|